A. Portes. “Immigration Theory for a New Century: Some Problems and
Opportunities.”
a. FOUR
COMMON PITFALLS
i.
The accumulation of data does not always lead to
theoretical innovation (“theories do not grow additively”); instead,
theoretical breakthroughs arise from the ability to make new connections not
previously seen
1. Observations
that some migrant groups are entrepreneurs who choose to live and work in
low-income areas led to the theory of middleman minorities and ethnic enclaves
ii.
Migration studies are largely data-driven and
rely on self-reporting, yet “theories do not necessarily correspond to people’s
perceptions”; immigrants may not be aware of the broader issues shaping their
experiences, or may have a different opinion of them than researchers, which
are only useful if the subjective experience is what the theory is attempting
to explain
1. Korean
immigrants in Baltimore have developed a middleman economy in the African
American inner city, yet they would deny that they are doing this when asked
iii.
Typologies, including administrative categories
(undocumented aliens, quota and nonquota migrants, skilled labor, refugees,
etc.) are not theories; they may become building blocks for theories but they
only assert differences without specifying their origins or anticipating
consequences
1. Typologies
enter the construction of theory as interaction effects (the assimilation of
children of professional immigrants is easier than those of labor immigrants)
or categorical endogenous values (the range of a variable to be explained
through characteristics of immigrant families and the receiving society)
2. A
fully-fledged theory should have a description of specific instances, an
identification and definition of a process or characteristic to be explained
(the dependent variable), one or more explanatory factors and their types of
effects, and a logical link with other similar propositions
iv.
Just as typologies are too specific to time and
place to become theories, so too there is no overall encompassing theory of
immigration; macro and micro-level forces leading to migration are nearly
impossible to unite in one grand theory
1. Migration
theories can be organized instead in sub-fields such as the origins of immigration,
the directionality and continuity of migrant flows, the utilization of
immigrant labor, and the sociocultural adaptation of immigrants
b. SAMPLER
OF THEMES FOR IMMIGRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY
i.
Transnational communities, or dense networks of
immigrants seeking economic and/or social advancement which span political
borders, and whose members lead dual lives
1. Transnational
migrants occupy social fields spanning geographic, cultural, and political
borders; technologies facilitating the rapid spread of people and information
around the world have made it easier for these transnational migrants to exist
today
ii.
The new second generation are the ones most
affected by adaptation processes, which are much different today than for
earlier waves of European immigrants in America
1. The
proliferation of transnational activities, discrimination against nonwhites,
and structural opposition to mainstream society are all new phenomena that may
limit the assimilation of the new second generation
iii.
Households and gender have frequently been
ignored in migration literature, but the relationships between the sexes and
the influence this has on the immigration process must be considered
iv.
The role of states and state building in the
onset of refugee flows is another line of investigation, as is the analysis of
the external and internal pressures on legislators who deal with immigration
1. “Path
dependence” and “cumulative causation” can explain the persistence of
immigration flows despite public opposition, while Merton’s concept of “unintended
consequences” can explain how legislation intended to curb immigration actually
ends up promoting it
v.
Comparative projects focusing on abstract
research topics and using a cross-national methodology are needed; this
approach can encompass all the other suggested fields of research as well
1. Cross-national
research is useful to determine the applicability of theories to different
national contexts, to generate typologies of interaction effects across
different national contexts, and to produce concepts and propositions of
broader scope
No comments:
Post a Comment